|
The penalty was even more harsh as he had to pay back all monies, $27,000, that he had been paid by the homeowner for the contract, even though there was nothing wrong with his work. Finally, he had to pay $107,000 in fines and attorneys’ fees.
The last paragraph reads:
“The obvious statutory intent is to discourage persons who have failed to comply with the licensing law from offering or providing their unlicensed services for pay. Because of the strength and clarity of this policy, it is well settled that section 7031 applies despite injustice to the unlicensed contractor. ‘Section 7031 represents a legislative determination that the importance of deterring unlicensed persons from engaging in the contracting business outweighs any harshness between the parties, and that such deterrence can best be realized by denying violators the right to maintain any action for compensation in the courts of this state.’ ” (Hydrotech Systems, Ltd. V. Oasis Waterpark (1991) 52 Cal. 3d988,995, original italics.)
The Court of Appeal of the State California, Sixth Appellate District upheld the trial court’s findings on 4/18/07 (H030399).
|
 |
|